Monday, 11 May 2009

Our justice system. Part 2

Hi again,
Back for round two?

This is not as vaguely sarcastic as the previous post, because to be honest I was quite interested in the whole affair. I haven't been in a district court ever before, so seeing the 'inside' is quite an eye opener and all quite structured,

  • Yes there is a lot of waiting around, but only because there are legal processes occurring in the background that jurors have no need to see.
  • The juror pool was not (as I had wondered) entirely made up of stay-at-home mums and the unemployed; it seemed to be a fairly good representation of NZ.
  • The intro video was actually worth watching, and not horribly cheesy.
  • The jury officer used an actual rotating ballot box to select the jury panel (two groups of 50 people)
And it was tense.

I don't know what it is, but waiting to have your name called out of a random ballot and list is surprisingly blood pumping. Waiting to see who gets challenged (and trying to guess why) is like an advanced class in people-watching.

However, I didn't get picked for a jury today, so my tour of the judicial system ended at 11am.

I will leave you with two statistics though:
  1. the jury that was picked was: female-4, male-8
  2. jurors that swore on a bible were-3, and not-9
Should we be surprised with number 2? Dismayed? Where is NZ in reality?
:(

The Lord God has told us what is right and what he demands:
"See that justice is done, let mercy be your first concern, and humbly obey your God."
Micah 6:8

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Are you suggesting 'stay at home mums' and the unemployed have the same staus????

Russell said...

No, I'm saying it is assumed that working people get off jury service in advance because of the very little return (especially financially) for their time. Leaving mums and unemployed with the duty (and mis-representing the jury pool)